The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday declined to urgently hear a plea related to the police action against student protesters during the Cockroach Janta Party’s (CJP) demonstration at Jantar Mantar. The protest highlighted serious allegations surrounding the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak.

This decision came after the issue was presented before a bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, where the petitioner’s counsel urged for an immediate hearing. The Chief Justice responded sharply, stating, “Don’t waste our time, and don’t waste your time.”

The lawyer argued that the students were raising critical concerns about public issues, including the alleged NEET-UG 2026 paper leak, the overall conduct of the examination, and pressing demands for reforms in the National Testing Agency (NTA).

As the counsel referenced videos allegedly showing police action against the demonstrators, Chief Justice Kant dismissed this evidence, saying, “We are not interested in videos; we don’t have time to watch.” The bench ultimately did not entertain the request for urgent proceedings.

This significant development follows a similar ruling from the Delhi High Court, which also declined to give urgent attention to a plea concerning the police actions during the protests. Such refusals raise questions about the judiciary’s engagement with matters affecting student rights and academic integrity.

The CJP has actively led protests against the alleged NEET-UG 2026 paper leak, demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and advocating for major reforms in the examination system. The protests grew more intense with a recent march toward Parliament, during which clashes erupted between the protesters and police. These incidents sparked allegations of excessive police force and resulted in multiple detentions.

While the Supreme Court’s observations specifically addressed the urgency of the appeal, they did not equate to a dismissal of the substantive claims made by the petitioners concerning the alleged police excesses during the protests.

In recent months, student protests have gained momentum across several states, emphasizing the need for transparency and accountability within the education sector. The NEET examinations have frequently faced scrutiny, with students voicing concerns over fairness and the integrity of the evaluation process.

This decision by the Supreme Court highlights a critical juncture in India’s educational landscape. While judicial intervention is essential in such disputes, the court’s prioritization of urgent matters raises concerns regarding systemic issues causing unrest among students.

As the situation unfolds, experts suggest that more proactive measures from both judicial authorities and the government are necessary to address the grievances of concerned students effectively and mitigate potential escalating protests.

NCP (SCP) chief Sharad Pawar met Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the Parliament on Wednesday. NCP (SCP) leader and Baramati MP Supriya Sule was also present at the meeting.

Both Sharad Pawar and MP Supriya Sule had earlier joined the protestors at Jantar Mantar on Tuesday, where the CJP is continuing its protest against the NEET-UG paper leak. The party has extended its support to the call for Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation.

Pawar urged the Centre to “sensitively consider the demands” and take appropriate action.

“The Indian Constitution has provided protection to the rights and entitlements of every citizen of the country, and the government and administration are accountable to the people. Therefore, instead of suppressing the students and citizens who are protesting peacefully for their demands, the government should sensitively consider their demands and take appropriate action by duly noting them,” he added.

Three persons were injured and 12 more houses were damaged in the Boh Valley of Himachal Pradesh’s Kangra district in overnight rain, officials said on Wednesday.

With this, the total number of houses damaged in the valley has climbed to 18. Six houses were washed away in a downpour on Tuesday.

The meteorological department warned of low to moderate flash flood risk in parts of Chamba, Kangra, Mandi, Shimla, Sirmaur and Kullu districts over the next 24 hours.

A cloudburst triggered flash floods and massive debris flows in Sapedi and Garun villages of the valley on Tuesday. Lam village also faces a threat. Several routes leading to the villages have been affected.

A total of 13 pucca houses and five kutcha houses have been damaged in the rain and three persons have been injured. Nine cowsheds have been damaged. Three buffaloes, four cows, one bull and one sheep died, the officials said.

According to reports, residents heard a loud blast-like sound from the hills moments before a powerful torrent of water, mud and boulders rushed downhill.

Timely evacuation of residents is believed to have prevented any loss of life.

The Shimla Meteorological Centre has issued an ‘orange’ alert for heavy to very heavy rains at isolated places in Kangra and Mandi districts and a ‘yellow’ alert for heavy rains in parts of Chamba, Kullu, Shimla, Solan and Sirmaur districts for Wednesday.

It cautioned that low to moderate flash flood risk is likely over a few watersheds and neighbourhoods of Chamba, Kangra, Mandi, Shimla, Sirmaur and Kullu districts over the next 24 hours.

The wet spell is likely to continue till July 27.

The officials said landslides also hit Dibba and Maned Nallah areas, making it difficult for rescue teams and administrative personnel to reach the disaster-hit locations.

Several roads in the state have been blocked due to torrential rains over the past few days.

The public has been asked to avoid unnecessary travel, stay away from rivers, streams, nallahs and landslide-prone slopes, and refrain from attempting to cross overflowing bridges or flooded roads.

The Delhi High Court is scheduled to hear on Wednesday a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking an independent investigation into the police action during climate activist Sonam Wangchuk’s hunger strike at Jantar Mantar and directions to safeguard citizens’ constitutional right to hold peaceful protests.

A division bench of Chief Justice Devender Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia is scheduled to hear the matter.

The PIL has been filed by Shakeel Abbas, a Delhi-based advocate, through Advocate Shakil Sheikh and Associates. It names the Union of India, the Delhi Police Commissioner, the Deputy Commissioner of Police (New Delhi District), the Station House Officer of Parliament Street Police Station, the Chief Secretary of the Delhi Government and the Medical Superintendent of Safdarjung Hospital as respondents.

According to the petition, the case concerns the alleged violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(b), 19(1)(c) and 21 of the Constitution during the alleged suppression of a peaceful and non-violent protest led by Sonam Wangchuk and other demonstrators. The petitioner has sought judicial safeguards to protect the right to peaceful assembly and expression.

The plea states that Sonam Wangchuk and several students and citizens began an indefinite hunger strike at Jantar Mantar on June 28, 2026, raising issues relating to the education system and alleged examination paper leaks. It claims that the protest remained peaceful until July 17 without any reported violence.

Referring to the events of July 18, the petition says that police personnel entered the protest site on the 21st day of the hunger strike. While official statements said Wangchuk was shifted to Safdarjung Hospital on medical grounds, the petition alleges that the protest site was cleared, several protesters were removed or detained against their wishes and excessive force was used while dispersing the gathering.

It further claims that protesters were harassed and prevented from continuing their demonstration.

The petitioner argues that the incident raises serious constitutional questions regarding the limits of police powers in dispersing peaceful assemblies and the need for an independent inquiry into the events of July 18. It also states that a representation-cum-complaint regarding the incident was submitted to the authorities before the PIL was filed.

The petition further contends that the alleged actions of the police had a chilling effect on democratic dissent and peaceful assembly. It submits that the PIL is not intended to espouse the personal cause of Sonam Wangchuk or any individual protester but seeks protection of constitutional freedoms available to every citizen. According to the petitioner, the reliefs sought are institutional and preventive in nature.

Among its principal prayers, the PIL seeks a direction to the Delhi Police Commissioner or another competent authority to conduct an independent, impartial and time-bound inquiry into the police action at Jantar Mantar on July 18, particularly the alleged use of force, detention of protesters and disruption of the hunger strike.

It also seeks preservation of CCTV footage, body-camera recordings, drone footage, wireless communication records, duty registers, medical records and other electronic and documentary evidence connected with the incident.

The petition further requests the High Court to direct the authorities to produce the complete records relating to the operation conducted on July 18, including deployment orders, authorisations for police action and medical communications. It also seeks appropriate action against officials found responsible after inquiry.

In addition, the PIL seeks formulation of comprehensive guidelines governing police action during peaceful demonstrations to ensure that protests are not arbitrarily disrupted and that constitutional safeguards relating to freedom of speech, peaceful assembly and personal liberty are protected in future.

The petitioner has also sought interim directions restraining authorities from taking coercive action, unlawful detention, intimidation, harassment or use of excessive force against Sonam Wangchuk or any other peaceful protester solely for participating in a lawful assembly, except in accordance with due process of law.

Benchmark indices Sensex and Nifty declined in early deals on Wednesday as higher crude oil prices and selling in bank stocks hit investors’ sentiment.

The 30-share BSE Sensex declined 403.54 points to 77,066.06 in early trade, taking the donwtrend to the third day running. The 50-share NSE Nifty edged lower by 114.75 points to 24,070.05.

From the Sensex pack, InterGlobe Aviation, Axis Bank, State Bank of India, Sun Pharma, Adani Ports, UltraTech Cement, HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank were among the major laggards.

Titan, Eternal, Maruti and Asian Paints were the winners.

Elevated crude oil prices and persistent geopolitical tensions have tempered risk appetite in the markets, according to an expert.

Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, quoted 1.15 per cent higher at USD 92.06 per barrel.

In Asian markets, South Korea’s KOSPI jumped 5.16 per cent. Japan’s Nikkei 225 index and Shanghai’s SSE Composite index were also trading higher, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index quoted lower.

US markets ended higher on Tuesday.

Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) turned buyers on Tuesday. They bought equities worth Rs 1,650.16 crore in the previous trade, according to exchange data.

On Tuesday, the Sensex declined 238.41 points, or 0.31 per cent, to settle at 77,470.11. The Nifty edged lower by 50.80 points, or 0.21 per cent, to end at 24,187.70.